Key Takeaways
- A GRC Tool Report is NOT a SOC 2® Attestation: A GRC tool produces an internal self-assessment (a “health journal”) for system monitoring. A SOC 2® report is a formal, independent professional opinion from a certified assessor (like a “thorough medical examination”).
- Credibility Requires Independence: Your clients, investors, and regulators require an unbiased, third-party judgment on the effectiveness of your controls. A printout from a software dashboard lacks the professional assurance and wide acceptance of a formal report from a qualified firm.
- Maturity Needs Time & Insight: While a 3-month period is the minimum allowed, clients prefer a 6- or 12-month period to prove consistent control maturity. Automated tools also cannot provide the nuanced, contextual insights and tailored recommendations that a human professional offers.
The Hidden Gaps
In today’s digital world, showing your clients that you are committed to protecting their data is a top priority. For many service organizations, a SOC 2® report has become the gold standard for demonstrating this commitment. You may have seen GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) tools promising a quick, 3-month security report. While these tools are great for internal management, relying on them alone for your official attestation can leave you with a document that falls short of your clients’ expectations.
At Auditwerx, we specialize in providing comprehensive, independent SOC 2® reports. We understand the appeal of a fast, automated solution, but we also know the critical difference between a tool’s internal report and a formal, third-party attestation. Here’s why a 3-month report isn’t a substitute for a comprehensive report from a professional assessment firm like Auditwerx.
Speak to a Compliance Specialist.
The GRC Tool Report: What It Is (and What It's Not)
Think of a GRC tool’s report as a self-generated health journal. It’s useful for you to track your daily progress, monitor your systems, and see if you’re following your own rules. It can tell you that you’ve been doing well for three months, but it’s an internal-use document.
A formal SOC 2® attestation, on the other hand, is like getting a thorough medical examination from an independent doctor. This is a formal statement from a certified professional who evaluates your health from an objective standpoint. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) sets the standards for these reports to provide external parties—your clients, investors, and partners—with an unbiased opinion on your controls. A GRC tool cannot provide this level of independent validation
Why a 3-Month GRC Tool Report Doesn't Fulfill Client Needs
Lack of Independent Assurance and Credibility: A SOC 2® attestation is not just a collection of data; it’s a professional opinion from an independent assessor on the effectiveness of your controls. A GRC tool can track your progress, but it cannot provide the unbiased, third-party judgment that gives a SOC report its weight and credibility. A formal report from a qualified firm is widely accepted and trusted by clients and regulators. A printout from a software dashboard simply won’t have the same impact.
The Insufficiency of a 3-Month Period: A SOC 2® Type 2 report is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of your controls over a period of time. While a 3-month period is the minimum allowed, it may not be sufficient to show the maturity and consistency of your security program. Many clients, particularly those in regulated industries, prefer to see a six-month or even a twelve-month observation period to ensure that your controls are not a snapshot in time, but a continuous and reliable practice. A longer period demonstrates a more mature and resilient security posture.
No Contextualized Insights or Recommendations: GRC tools are automated. They can tell you if a control passed or failed based on preset rules, but they cannot provide the nuanced, contextual analysis that a human assessor can. A qualified professional will not only identify gaps but will also offer tailored, actionable recommendations for improvement based on your unique systems, business processes, and industry best practices. This human element provides invaluable feedback that helps you mature your security program beyond a one-time compliance check.
Narrower Scope of Evaluation: While a GRC tool may focus heavily on security, a proper SOC 2® report can evaluate your controls against five Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. A professional assessment firm will work with you to scope the report to all relevant criteria for your organization, providing a much more comprehensive and meaningful evaluation of your entire system. A GRC tool’s report may have a narrower focus, leaving your clients with unanswered questions.
The Winning Combination: Your GRC Tool + Auditwerx
This isn’t an “either/or” scenario. The most successful compliance programs use a powerful combination of both. You can use your GRC tool to:
Streamline evidence collection.
Automate internal monitoring.
Manage tasks and workflows.
Track progress toward compliance goals.
Then, partner with a specialized assessment firm like Auditwerx to:
Perform a comprehensive, independent evaluation.
Leverage our professional judgment and deep industry knowledge.
Obtain a formal, credible, and widely accepted SOC 2® report.
Receive tailored recommendations for continuous improvement.
A 3-month report from a GRC tool is a great starting point for internal readiness, but it cannot replace the formal, independent assurance that clients require. To truly build trust and demonstrate a mature security posture, your business needs a comprehensive report from a qualified and specialized firm.
At Auditwerx, we turn your internal efforts into an externally credible statement of compliance. We provide the assurance, professional insight, and partnership you need to give your clients and stakeholders the confidence they demand.
Ready to take your security and compliance to the next level? Contact Auditwerx today to learn how our team can help you achieve a robust and credible SOC 2® report that will open doors and build lasting trust.
FAQs
What is the main difference between a GRC tool's report and a formal SOC 2® attestation?
The main difference is independence and credibility. A GRC tool provides an internal, self-generated progress report. A formal SOC 2® attestation is an objective, professional opinion on your controls from an independent, certified assessor that meets AICPA standards for external parties.
Why do clients often prefer a SOC 2® report covering more than three months?
A SOC 2® Type 2 report evaluates controls over a period of time. While three months is the minimum, many clients prefer a six-month or twelve-month period to ensure your security program is a consistent and mature practice, not just a snapshot in time.
If I use a GRC tool for compliance, do I still need a firm like Auditwerx?
Yes. The most successful compliance programs use a powerful combination. You should use your GRC tool to streamline evidence, monitor systems, and manage workflows. You then partner with a firm like Auditwerx to perform the independent evaluation and issue the formal, credible SOC 2® report your clients require.
Can a GRC tool provide the same level of insight as a professional assessor?
No. GRC tools are automated and report pass/fail status based on preset rules. A qualified professional will not only identify gaps but will also offer nuanced, contextual analysis and tailored, actionable recommendations for continuous improvement based on your unique business and industry.
About the Author
